Hendersonville Instant runoff voting in Nov – Will your vote be counted? Surprising answer

Will Hendersonville voters’ instant runoff votes in the November election count or even be counted? Does Hendersonville’s IRV counting method rob some voters of their say in the runoff? How will Hendersonville North Carolina tally the upcoming instant runoff voting election for Mayor and City Council? Will voters understand how votes are sorted, allocated and reallocated? Will voters help or hurt their favorite candidate by ranking choices? The answers are discouraging if you care about every vote counting, about election integrity, transparency and about fairness to voters.

I sent an email to Henderson County’s Board of Elections to find out: what votes will be counted and reported, which IRV votes will be counted, and how will the IRV votes be counted and reported? Henderson BoE Director Beverly Cunningham promptly provided these answers below in 2 emails on October 16, see lower down the page.

The answer -not all Instant runoff votes get counted. It is a fact that some or all 2nd and 3rd choice votes cast will be kept secret and hidden from the public and never counted. Just because second and third round votes are not needed or utilized in determining an outcome does not mean that they were not cast by a voter. It is a bad practice for government to keep any expression by voters secret.

If there is a winner in the first round of voting, then officials will not count or even report the voters 2nd and 3rd choice votes. If there is not a winner in the first round, then only votes for the top two candidates will be considered from the 2nd round. 2nd choice votes for any other candidates will not be counted or reported.

Not only will candidates and voters be in the dark as to how much support each candidate got, but voters will not be able to look at the results and see if they hurt or helped their preferred candidates by ranking. It is a fact that Hendersonville voters can hurt their preferred candidates just by ranking them, according to Dr. Steven Brams of New York University. But if Henderson’s Board of Elections does not count and report all 2nd and 3rd choice votes, we have no way to know if this happens.

Nothing about how Hendersonville’s election is typical of IRV – IRV is for single seat election contests, Hendersonville is using it for multi-seat elections and thwarting the use of bullet voting also called “single shot” voting.

Downsides with Hendersonville’s Instant runoff voting procedures:

1. Voters are handicapped by IRV because they do not know who the top 2 candidates are that they should vote for, so there vote might not count in the “instant runoff”. In a traditional runoff, voters would all have an equal opportunity to vote for the runoff candidates.

2. Candidates, supporters and IRV advocates will not know how IRV benefited or hindered their 2nd and 3rd choice votes since Henderson’s BoE doesn’t plan to count or report these votes. Democracy and transparency are weakened when all votes are not counted.

Most IRV jurisdictions count and report all of the voters choices. Only Hendersonville, NC will not do so. Below is an example of how San Francisco reports all of the vote data:













Henderson BoE Director Beverly Cunningham 2 emails on October 16:

1) In Hendersonville’s 2007 IRV election, did the Henderson County BoE count or record or report any of the 2nd or 3rd choice votes? No, we stop counting when a threshold of victory is met.

2) What plans does the Henderson County Board of Elections have in order to count, record and report the 2nd and 3rd choice votes for the 2009 IRV election? I understand we will follow the same procedures as explained in No. 1).

3) In the 2009 IRV election, which if any of the 2nd and 3rd choice votes will be publicly reported and or counted? Only votes needed to determine the threshold of victory will be reported.

4) Provide the method, algorithm and spreadsheet that will be used to report and tally the IRV results. Still waiting on state to provide info.

5) Provide the “rules” to sorting and re-allocating the IRV 2nd and 3rd choice votes. (this is a second request) Still waiting on state to provide info.

Beverly W. Cunningham, Director
Henderson County Board of Elections
828 697 4970

Email 2, info requests continued:

4) Provide the method, algorithm and spreadsheet that will be used to report and tally the IRV results. The method of tabulation is a manual process utilizing Microsoft Excel to augment the sorting and totaling.

5) Provide the “rules” to sorting and re-allocating the IRV 2nd and 3rd choice votes.

1. Tabulation

o Determine the two (2) candidates with the most votes that are in the instant runoff.
o The candidates retain all the votes from the 1st round of tabulation. All ballots for the contest that have votes for candidates in the runoff are removed from the tabulation (they have
already been tabulated).
o Review (2nd Choice) to determine ifthere is a vote for either runoff candidate. If yes, add the vote to therunoff candidate and no further examination of the ballot is necessary.
o If there is no vote for either runoff candidate in (2ndChoice) then
review (3rd Choice) to determine if there is a vote for a runoff candidate.
If yes, add the vote to the runoff candidate and no further examination of the ballot is necessary.
o End of ballot examination. The runoff candidate with the most votes is declared the winner.

Beverly W. Cunningham,Director
Henderson County Board of Elections
828 697 4970

Hendersonville Contests and Candidates for November IRV election:

CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE MAYOR
Timm Kurtz
Mary Jo Padgett
Barbara G. Volk

CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE COUNCIL
Diane Caldwell
Jeff Collis
Ralph Freeman
Jerry Smith
Ron Stephens

Want to see what Hendersonville’s ballot will look like?

If you vote in person, you will cast your ballot on a touchscreen machine. Here are screen shots of that ballot. Its easy to see how confusing the ballot would be when presented on a touchscreen machine.

If you cast an absentee by mail ballot, here is a copy of the paper ballot and some information: CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE w/ Instant Runoff Voting

About us: The North Carolina Coalition for Verified Voting is a grassroots non-partisan organization fighting for clean and verified elections. We study and research the issue of voting to ensure the dignity and integrity of the intention of each voting citizen. The NC Voter Verified Coalition has consistently fought for increasing access, participation and ensuring the voter franchise. Contact Joyce McCloy, Director, N.C. Coalition for Verifiable Voting – phone 336-794-1240 website http://www.ncvoter.net/ and also http://www.instantrunoffvoting.us/

FVAP recommends 4 changes to NC law to help overseas military voters

Four good ideas, one really bad one. A Federal agency is recommending four changes to North Carolina law to help our overseas military vote. The Federal Voting Assistance Program also endorses having troops send voted ballots by “unsecure electronic means” as long as the troops volunteer.

The Federal Voting Assistance Program has recommended four changes:

  1. Expanded Use of Federal Write-In Absentee Ballot,
  2. Participation with Uniform Law Commission Effort and Adoption of Recommendations,
  3. Removal of Notarization and Witnessing Requirements…
  4. Enfranchise Citizens, Who Have Never Resided in the U.S.

In the meanwhile, the NC State Board of Elections is seeking ways to immediately help our military voters. On Oct 8, 2009, the NC SBoE recently sent a letter to the Secretary of the Department of Defense, Robert Gates asking the DoD to designate the DOD as a voter registration agency in our state.

Details of The Federal Voting Assistance Program Recommendations
FVAP recommendations are in this letter dated Oct 7. See excerpts below, and note that a long term goal is to transmit voted ballots electronically :

Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP) letter to North Carolina State Board of Elections, dated October 7, 2009

Given our new focus, FVAP is realigning in Legislative Initiative recommendations to the States. The enclosed initiatives focus on sending ballots to voters at least 45 days before the election. FVAP also recommends the expanded use of email and online retransmission for all election materials throughout the entire absentee voting process, replacing fax and postal mail where possible. Until secure electronic transmission of voted ballots has been established, we recommend that States allow voters to return static copies of voted ballots through available electronic means. However, the decision to send a voted ballot by unsecure electronic means must rest with the individual voter based on the voter’s desire to cast his or her vote electronically or to ensure the secrecy of their ballot.

Email and online capabilities are widely available to Uniformed Service members and overseas citizens, vastly eclipsing the usefulness of faxing. After a September 2008 visit to military bases in the Middle East, Asia and Europe, a delegation of six State Chief Election Officials reported that “the system of delivering ballots and returning them by mail is archaic compared to the pace of modern military operations” and “…reliance on fax machines to speed the voting process….is largely unworkable for deployed troops.” The delegation also reported that individual service members and overseas citizens confirmed that in overseas locales fax capabilities were not readily available and “indicated a strong preference for, and almost universal access to, email or internet based voting procedures.”

We realize that universal adoption of email and online applications to deliver voting materials will not happen immediately, as State governments must engage the legislative and policy decision making process to implement such changes (that is also why, for the first time, FVAP is sending this letter to both the State Chief Election Officer and the leaders of State legislative chambers, in recognition of the role of both branches of government play in resolving these problems). In the interim, FVAP will encourage and assist Uniformed Service and overseas voters to greatly increase the use of the Federal Write-in Absentee Ballot (FWAB). Given the inherent delays in sending ballots by mail, the FWAB represents the only ballot readily available for many of these voters. Therefore, FVAP recommends that States expand its use to include simultaneous registration, ballot request, and voted absentee ballot for all elections at all levels: general, primary, special, and runoff elections for Federal, State, and local offices. In expanding the use of the FWAB in this manner, individually developed State Write-In Ballots will no standardize the “emergency ballot” process for these voters, reduce confusion as to which form to use, and allow election officials to focus their education on one form and its processes.

Additionally, FVAP strongly supports standardizing the voting process for Uniformed Services and overseas voters across all States…

This year, FVAP evaluated its legislative initiatives with regard to the impact they have on absentee voting by uniformed service members and overseas citizens, as both separate populations and collectively. FVAP sorted these initiatives according to the degree which each affected these populations. That analysis indicated that three initiatives provided the most benefit to the voters: 45 day ballot transit time prior to the election, the use of electronic transmission, and expanding the use of the Federal Write-In Absentee ballot to include, in addition to general elections, primary, run-off and special elections for federal, State and local offices. These three initiatives, therefore, received the highest weighting, totaling 8-%. Based upon this weighted measure, FVAP is providing a State-by-State score representing FVAP’s success in convincing States to adopt our legislative initiatives.

…North Carolina’s score is 71.5%.
…..
After reviewing North Carolina’s existing election code and procedures, we have identified four initiatives for your legislature to consider during the upcoming legislative session. These Initiatives are discussed in detail with suggested working in the enclosed Legislative Initiatives document. Information available to FVAP indicates that there are 32,718 Uniformed Service members, an estimated 78,832 family members of voting age, and approximately 116,200 overseas citizens who claim North Carolina as their voting residence….

2010 Legislative Initiatives

Expanded Use of Federal Write-In Absentee Ballot

…the FWAB should be accepted simultaneously as a voter registration application, absentee ballot request, and absentee ballot. This provision will allow highly mobile population to participate in elections far in advance of a deployment, reassignment or move. Finally, FVAP is recommending a new policy that the FWAB be the only write-in ballot used for Uniformed Services and overseas voters, the authorization and use of both a FWAB and a State Write-In Absentee Ballot introduces greater complexity and opportunity for error for Uniformed Services and overseas voters. Using the single FWAB will allow future technological solution by FVAP to incorporate State and local races into online FWAB solutions, further extending this franchise opportunity.

Participation with Uniform Law Commission Effort and Adoption of Recommendations

The Uniform Law Commission (ULC) is drafting the “Military Services and Overseas Civilian Absentee Voting Act” to be presented for future adoption by the States. FVAP

Uniformity and standardization of voting laws for the Uniformed Services and overseas voters would substantially ease the burden of compliance and improve voter success. Furthermore, FVAP recommends that the State Chief Election Official work closely with the State legislative body to enact the Act when it is presented to the
States for adoption. …

Removal of Notarization and Witnessing Requirements

Enfranchise Citizens Who Have Never Resided in the U.S.

Many U.S. citizens, who have never resided in a State or territory, are not entitled to vote under current State law. These citizens are voting age children of U.S. citizens who are eligible to vote under UOCAVA themselves…

complete letter here
(pdf)

Letter to DOD, help us help troops vote says North Carolina State Board of Elections

Our overseas troops need help voting, and the North Carolina State Board of Elections is seeking options.

Election boards wonder if military ballots are too costly Saturday, September 26, 2009 By Gerald Witt Staff Writer GREENSBORO — An overwhelming majority of military and overseas voters did not return ballots to the United States in 2006, costing local election offices staff time and money

According to the Overseas Vote Foundation:

“The number one reason that many overseas and military citizens are unable to vote is missed registration and ballot request deadlines.”

The North Carolina State Board of Elections is doing what it can right now to address the issue of military voter registration and voting.

On Oct 8, 2009 the NC State Board of Elections sent a letter to Robert Gates, Secretary of DOD enlisting their cooperation. An excerpt:

“I request that the Department of Defense, in its operation of military pay/personnel offices in North Carolina, agree to be designated as a voter registration agency. This designation would allow military citizens helped by your agency to be offered the same voter registration services given by state and county public services agencies to the persons they serve. “

The State BoE is also offering help and materials in order to do this.

Their solution, if implemented – will help alleviate some of the problems military voters have in voting. Troops can more easily keep their voter registration updated and get help in obtaining a ballot and getting that ballot returned.

One big problem for troops is that they move around frequently, their registrations are not updated, and we keep sending ballots to the old addresses.

This makes sense. North Carolina enforced Section 7 of the Voting Rights Act more vigorously in 2008, resulting in government agencies assisting increased numbers of their clients in registering to vote.

It is efforts like these, often successful ones, that make me appreciate our officials at the North Carolina State Board of Elections.

ES&S back like a bad penny in Sarasota County Florida

ES&S is back like a bad penny in Sarasota County. The ES&S purchase of Diebold is causing Sarasota officials major heartburn. The county ditched ES&S as a vendor in the wake of the disastrous 18,000 undervotes in the 13th Congressional District race in 2006. That same year, a referendum to ditch the paperless voting machines was passed. ES&S was thrown out even though they were the lowest bid for new paper ballot systems.
It looks like Sarasota is stuck with ES&S, but are they stuck with Kathy Dent?

3 years after vote furor, machine vendor is back
MERGER: ES&S, once again the provider in Sarasota, now dominates the field
By Doug Sword September 24, 2009 at 1:00 a.m.
Two years after being shown the door for its role in an election that local officials would just as soon forget, voting machine maker ES&S is once again overseeing the system Sarasota County residents will use to cast their votes. …Opposition locally, though, is less legal and more emotional, stemming from the role of the ES&S iVotronic voting system in the disputed November 2006 election.

Feelings toward the company among locals has not changed much since July 2007 when county commissioners, still smarting from the controversy over the 18,000 undervotes in the 13th Congressional District race in 2006, replaced ES&S with Diebold, which later changed its name to Premier.

Sarasota should have ditched the Elections Supervisor, Kathy Dent, instead of or along with the vendor. All voting systems have bugs, and Dent was warned in plenty of time, and what did she do to protect voters? If that had happened in our state, it is quite possible Dent would have been relieved of her job.

The vendor had warned Election Supervisor Kathy Dent ahead of time of issues that might cause problems voting.

ES&S sent a “software bug” memo to Florida SOEs in August of 2006 that there was a problem with a “smoothing filter” that would possibly delay the recording of the voter’s selections. This delay would be longer than expected, and the voter might move on before the vote was recorded.

ES&S recommended putting signs in the voting booths to warn voters, and also recommended a “software patch” prior to the November election.

I do not know if all or any Florida machines ever received that patch, or if the patch was distributed, if it was put on every single voting machine. Further, if the patch was applied, was it tested? Did it work uniformly on all machines, including those that were ADA enabled?

See the memo that ES&S sent Kathy Dent, here: http://www.ncvoter.net/downloads/ESS_Aug_2006_iVotronic_FL_memo.pdf

If ballot style was the sole cause of FL 13 undervote, then we in North Carolina should have had far worse problems in our iVotronic counties.

Here is Sarasota FL 13’s ballot http://www.ncvoter.net/downloads/sarasota_ballot_style.pdf

Now take a look at what appears to be a more confusing ballot style
for Mecklenburg County NC, the NC 08 ballot:
http://www.ncvoter.net/downloads/Mecklenburg_2006_ballot.pdf
(notice the nearly hidden placement of the US congressional race?)
Meckelnburg had a 4 % undervote rate for that contest.

Here is a memo from the NC State Board of Elections explaining the differences in NC iVotronics and the FL iVotronics, as well as a ballot comparison:
http://www.ncvoter.net/downloads/Sarasota_NC_Ballot_Comparison_06.pdf

North Carolina Internet Voting Whack-a-Mole,military vote by email not secure, not private

It is Internet Voting Whackamole Time – this time in North Carolina. The Greensboro News and Record is running an OpEd that endorses having overseas military cast their ballots by email, over the internet.

Does anyone believe that if email/internet voting were allowed for overseas that it would not spread to the rest of our elections? Making military votes go over e-mail is unsafe in the first place. It makes them subject to attack and makes the military voters second class citizens. Additionally they lose their privacy and the secrecy of the ballot. Insecure voting does not honor our troops one little bit.

The Editorial Dept of Greensboro News and Record and popular progressive North Carolina State Rep Grier Martin are endorsing email balloting for our overseas military.
Please email Rep Grier Martin grier.martin@ncleg.net and tell him that email/internet voting is not a solution but a problem and we should work with computer scientists and the Overseas Vote Foundation to find the right solution. (his phone 919-733-5758)
Send a letter to the editor of the N-R too: edpage@news-record.com
Also, you can visit the article online and post a comment. (reports on internet voting at bottom of this email)

Editorial: Defending democracy
Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Every American’s right to vote must be protected. And there’s a special obligation to guarantee ballot access for Americans serving their country overseas.

“If we do not make it possible for the folks defending our democracy to participate in our democracy, what does that say? If you’re risking your life to defend our democracy, we should bend over backward and spare no expense to make it possible to vote,” state Rep. Grier Martin, D-Wake, said Tuesday.

Martin served with the U.S. Army in Afghanistan in 2002-2003. As a legislator, he’s pushed for easier absentee ballot access for servicemen.

A bill approved this year directs election boards to send absentee ballots earlier and allows for their return up to three days after a primary or general election. It also asks the absentee voter to include the signature of only one witness instead of two, which was previously required.

The new law adds an emergency provision that authorizes the State Board of Elections to take exceptional action to allow voting if normal procedures aren’t possible. This would cover a last-minute deployment just before an election, Martin said.

These are relatively small changes that can make the difference for some military personnel and other Americans abroad. More sweeping improvements are needed, too.

Guilford County Supervisor of Elections George Gilbert last week noted the cost of mailing absentee ballots overseas and the relatively low rate of return, especially for off-year municipal elections.

The expense can be justified, but using the mail to carry ballots across oceans is outdated. In fact, North Carolina law allows electronic transmission of ballots, and voting by e-mail should be put into regular practice as soon as possible.

“It amazed me when I was in Afghanistan how connected we are,” Martin said. “The technology is there.”

Gilbert anticipates greater use of e-mail and the Internet in the near future. “We’re told by the Department of Defense that all military personnel have e-mail addresses,” he said.

The State Board of Elections is getting closer to offering full electronic transmission of absentee ballots to overseas voters, Executive Director Gary Bartlett said Tuesday. Currently, ballots can be sent by e-mail, printed by the voter, filled out and returned by fax to the state board, which then distributes them to county boards.

There are still ballot security issues to work out, but Bartlett believes North Carolina can become a leader in election technology. Besides helping voters overseas, the same technology can improve ballot access for voters with disabilities, he said.

All Americans should be guaranteed reasonable access to polling places. New technologies should make that easier, wherever they are.

Americans serving overseas deserve every opportunity to vote. If not for the defenders of democracy, no one’s rights would be secure for long.

http://www.news-record.com/content/2009/09/29/article/editorial_defending_democracy


Key phrase here: “There are still ballot security issues to work out, but Bartlett believes North Carolina can become a leader in election technology. “ But instead North Carolina would be a leader in jumping off of a cliff. North Carolina has already been a “leader” in things like paperless voting, and that bombed.

The Pew report points out that North Carolina is the ONLY state in the country that requires overseas ballots to be returned by the day BEFORE election day. They could add one more day to the time frame and give themselves further cushion by allowing ballots to be returned ON election day like other states, before resorting to methods which raise more ballot security issues.
North Carolina is NOT listed as one of the states which needs changes made to their existing situation in order for military voters overseas to be able to get voted ballots back.
http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/Election_reform/NTTV_Report_Web.pdf

A solution recommended by the Overseas Voter Foundation:
“require that all UOCAVA (The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee) voters file an FPCA (Federal Post Card Application) for each election year in which they intend to vote. It should be possible to indicate which election year the ballot request form is filed for on the form itself (it is not at present possible to indicate this).
Maintain the law but add a minor provision which allows election officials to discontinue sending ballots to addresses from which the ballots are returned undeliverable, or not at all. “

Is Internet Voting Safe? Vote Here
Threat Level Privacy, Crime and Security Online.
By Kevin Poulsen Email Author; June 4, 2009
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/06/cfp-evote/

Computer Technologists’ statement on internet voting September 11th, 2008 Because of the increasing frequency of proposals to allow remote voting over the internet, we believe it is necessary to warn policymakers and the public that secure internet voting is a very hard technical problem, and that we should proceed with internet voting schemes only after thorough consideration of the technical and non-technical issues in doing so. Please read our statement, and, if you are a “computer expert”, consider endorsing it
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/article.php?id=5867

See “Computer criminals”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_convicted_computer_criminals

NC Verified Voting Meetup Aug 26 Celebrates 4 Year Anniversary of paper ballot law

For immediate release
Joyce McCloy, North Carolina Coalition for Verified Voting 336-794-1240

Please join the NC Coalition for Verified Voting for our Annual Voting Integrity Meetup
In celebration of the fourth anniversary of SL-323the Public Confidence in Elections Law
Wednesday August 26, 2009
6:00 – 7:30 PM
at the Busy Bee Cafe in Raleigh
in the upstairs room
225 South Wilmington Street
(plenty of FREE Parking nearby)

The NC Coalition for Verified Voting invites you to join other election integrity supporters in celebrating the fourth anniversary of the Public Confidence in Elections Law, SL 323.

Agenda

  • Introduction – North Carolina passed one of the strongest verified voting laws in the country four years ago.
  • “Legislator of the Year” award.
  • Guest Speaker: David Allen, member of the Joint Select Committee on Electronic Voting
  • Discussion of goals for 2009/2010 in protecting the voter franchise.
  • Input from attendees on their concerns about elections and voting in 2010.

There is no charge other than buy-your-own-food and or drink.
This will be a great opportunity for election integrity people to hang out face-to-face, and to meet some of new and old faces of North Carolina activists.

About us: The North Carolina Coalition for Verified Voting is a grassroots non-partisan organization fighting for clean and verified elections. We study and research the issue of voting to ensure the dignity and integrity of the intention of each voting citizen. The NC Voter Verified Coalition has consistently fought for increasing access, participation and ensuring the voter franchise. Contact Joyce McCloy, Director, N.C. Coalition for Verifiable Voting – phone 336-794-1240 – email Join the NC Coalition for Verified Voting

New voting hack uses machines decommissioned by a North Carolina county

A bold new voting hack uses machines decommissioned by a North Carolina county. This hack demonstrates how important it was for the North Carolina legislature to pass one of the strongest verified voting laws in the country.

August 14, 2009
For immediate release

Joyce McCloy, North Carolina Coalition for Verified Voting 336-794-1240

A new voting hack takes over the machine, is practical, and costs only $100,000 to replicate. Computer scientists from three prestigious U.S. universities managed to hack into and steal votes from an electronic voting machine that was designed to resist takeover attempts. The hack comes on the anniversary of North Carolina’s law requiring paper ballots and regulating voting machines and vendors.The machines used in the research were decommissioned paperless voting machines from Buncombe County North Carolina.

This hack uses a return oriented program that was only developed in 2007 – scientists did not inject code into the system, they “reverse engineered” the system. They did not have to invade the ROM “read only memory”. Then the researchers were able to do an extremely clever hack on the system. This “return memory” hack has consequences not just for voting technology, but for computing technology. The hack would be much harder to detect than anything seen so far.

Computer scientists who performed the hack repeat calls for paper ballots in elections to increase transparency and ensure recovery from election problems.
North Carolina’s General Assembly passed such measures 4 years ago this week.

The Public Confidence in Elections Law SL 323 was ratified on August 16, 2005 and approved on August 26, 2005.
http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2005/Bills/Senate/HTML/S223v7.html .

This bill was passed with unanimous vote and full bi partisan support in the wake of a true election debacle in November, 2004: “A Florida-style nightmare has unfolded in North Carolina in the days since Election Day, with thousands of votes missing and the outcome of two statewide races still up in the air.” — AP Newswire, Nov 13 – North Carolina Ballot Blues
http://www.newsobserver.com/print/friday/opinion/story/184232.html

SL323 Public Confidence in Elections Became Law 4 years ago:
08/13/2005 Senate Concurred In H/com Sub 08/16/2005
Ratified 08/19/2005 Pres. To Gov. 8/17/2005
08/26/2005 Signed By Gov. 8/26/2005
08/26/2005 Ch. SL 2005-323
http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2005&BillID=sb+223&submitButton=Go

Researchers “hack the vote” in real-world e-voting attack by Ryan Paul Aug 13, 09
..Using a technique called return-oriented programming, they were able to circumvent the machine’s built-in safeguards and divert votes—without having access to source code or non-public documentation. … this study goes a step further and shows that it can be done in the wild without privileged access to source code or other specialized materials.
http://arstechnica.com/security/news/2009/08/researchers-demonstrate-real-world-voting-machine-attack.ars

Voting machine hack costs less than $100,000 August 12, 2009
Researchers use a new return-oriented programming attack to change results
By Robert McMillan IDG News Service

The hack wasn’t easy — Halderman estimates that it took about 16 man-months of work to pull it off — but at university salaries that would still be cheaper than most U.S. election campaigns, he said. “The cost of that time was less than $100,000,” he said. The work was done without access to source code or any documentation beyond what is available on Sequoia’s Web site.

But using a new hacking technique, called a return-oriented programming attack, researchers were able to trick the machine into changing the results of an election, according to Alex Halderman, one of the university researchers behind the work. Halderman is with the University of Michigan, but researchers from the University of California, San Diego and Princeton University were also involved in the project. They presented their results at the Usenix 2009 Electronic Voting Workshop, held in Montreal this week.

The researchers tested their results on a machine purchased from a government auction site after Buncombe County, North Carolina, stopped using the voting machines in 2007.
http://www.infoworld.com/d/security-central/voting-machine-hack-costs-less-100000-518

Hang your head, Sequoia e-voting machine; you’ve been hacked again
Aug 13th 2009 Oh, Princeton University, won’t you leave the poor electronic voting machines alone?
http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/13/hang-your-head-sequoia-e-voting-machine-youve-been-hacked-aga

The researchers’ 16 page report about the hack tells how the scientists obtained the voting machines. The machines used in the study were:

“machines decommissioned by Buncombe County, North Carolina, and purchased by Andrew Appel through a government auction site….”In 1997, Buncombe County, North Carolina, purchased a number of AVC Advantage electronic voting machines for $5200 each. In January 2007, they retired these machines and auctioned them off through a government surplus web site. Andrew Appel purchased one lot of five machines for $82 in total.”

Other hacks on these machines

Princeton publishes how-to guide for hacking Sequoia e-voting machines
by Tim Stevens posted Oct 24th 2008
Sequoia is now under the microscope and, after a little quality time with the company’s machines, Princeton researchers have filed a 158 page report on the ease of replacing their ROMs and winning yourself an election.

http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/24/princeton-publishes-how-to-guide-for-hacking-sequoia-e-voting-ma/

February 8, 2007 Princeton U prof Andrew Appel hacks machine purchased from Buncombe County North Carolina.
“The AVC Advantage can be easily manipulated to throw an election because the chips which control the vote-counting are not soldered on to the circuit board of the DRE. This means the vote-counting firmware can be removed and replace with fraudulent firmware.”
http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~appel/avc/

About us: The North Carolina Coalition for Verified Voting is a grassroots non-partisan organization fighting for clean and verified elections. We study and research the issue of voting to ensure the dignity and integrity of the intention of each voting citizen. The NC Voter Verified Coalition has consistently fought for increasing access, participation and ensuring the voter franchise. Contact Joyce McCloy, Director, N.C. Coalition for Verifiable Voting – phone 336-794-1240 – email Join the NC Coalition for Verified Voting website http://www.ncvoter.net/

S 966:Stop Campaign Cash "Catch 22" in North Carolina

We know that some of our officials are in a catch 22 situation – accept donations from special interests – or – run an underfunded campaign. We can help officials running for office by supporting S-966 , “Expand Voter-Owned Elections for Council of State.”

*Could you please take the easy, 60 second action alert prepared by Democracy For NC?
*In that action alert, please note in the comments that NC Verified Voting supports S966.
This sends a message that the verified voting folks are still out there and still care about elections.

Clean elections are part of the big picture, and that means helping candidates run without fear of conflict of interest.
Democracy for NC says:
“Right now, candidates who lead regulatory agencies (like the state Treasurer and Commissioner of Labor) get most of their campaign money from the very businesses their agencies contract with or regulate.
Voter-Owned Elections gives candidates an alternative: They can qualify for public campaign financing by first collecting lots of small donations from registered voters. VOE is working now for the Insurance Commissioner and two other Council of State offices, as well as for state judges. We must expand the program.”
Thank you to all dedicated verified voting activists for your help in this matter.
The North Carolina Coalition for Verified Voting is a grassroots non-partisan organization fighting for clean and verified elections. We study and research the issue of voting to ensure the dignity and integrity of the intention of each voting citizen. The NC Voter Verified Coalition has consistently fought for increasing access, participation and ensuring the voter franchise. Contact Joyce McCloy, Director, N.C. Coalition for Verifiable Voting – phone 336-794-1240 – email Join the NC Coalition for Verified Voting

Touch Screens High Rate of Unrecorded Votes for President in 2008

For immediate release
Prof. Mark Lindeman 845-399-0133
Joyce McCloy, North Carolina Coalition for Verified Voting 336-794-1240
Sean Flaherty, Verified Voting Foundation 319-621-8651

Touch Screens Show High Rate of Unrecorded Votes for President in 2008 Paper Ballots Found More Efficient at Recording Voters’ Choices

June 26, 2009 – A professor’s study of North Carolina’s 2008 Presidential election shows that optically scanned paper ballots were better at registering the intent of the voters than touch screen voting machines.

Mark Lindeman, an assistant professor of political science at Bard College in New York, found that in the 67 North Carolina counties where the voting method is optically scanned paper ballots, 0.78% of ballots failed to register a vote for President last November. The 24 counties where touch screens were the principal method of voting saw 1.36% of ballots fail to register a vote for President, a difference of over 7000 votes in the 2008 election.

“The evidence available to me indicates that in fact, optically scanned paper ballots fared better than DREs [touch screens] in recording and tabulating voter intent,” Prof. Lindeman wrote.1

Lindeman also analyzed demographic differences among the counties that might explain the higher number of unrecorded votes in the counties that used touch screens. He found, in fact, that paper ballot counties measured higher in factors such as less education and poverty that would be expected lead to a high rate of unrecorded votes, meaning that the “effect ” of touch screens on the unrecorded vote rate was even greater than the raw numbers suggest.

Voting experts believe that a small number of voters, usually less than 1%, decide deliberately not to cast a vote for President, but that if the number of ballots that show no vote for President is higher with a given voting technology, it is a sign that the technology was less easy for voters to use, or may not have functioned properly. The percentage of ballots that fail to register a vote for a given office is called the “residual vote rate.”

“DRE boosters say the residual vote rate should be lower on touch screens than on scanned paper ballots, but the performance doesn’t match the promises” said Lindeman.

Prof. Lindeman’s findings are consistent with previous studies showing that precinct-based paper ballot scanners have a lower residual vote than touch screen machines. A study of the Brennan Center for Justice showed that precinct-based optical scanners had the lowest residual vote rate of any type of technology in the 2004 Presidential election.2 In 2006, Iowa’s election results for all contested statewide races showed a consistently higher residual vote rate for touch screens than for optically scanned paper ballots.3

“Optical scan has a strong track record, and these findings just make it stronger,” said Pamela Smith of the Verified Voting Foundation. “This is why we fought so hard for optical scan back in 2005 and 2006,” said Joyce McCloy, director of the North Carolina Coalition for Verified Voting. “It turns out that the lower-tech way best serves the voters,” McCloy added.

-30-

1Professor Lindeman’s study is available at: http://www.ncvoter.net/downloads/Lindeman_Analysis_NC08_Tech_Effect_on_Undervotes.pdf
2 The Machinery of Democracy: Voting System Usability,” p. 5. http://brennan.3cdn.net/bb59042f6839b7fee2_njm6bcl84.pdf
3“Residual Votes in Iowa November 2006,”
http://www.iowansforvotingintegrity.org/Residual Votes in Iowa November 2006.ppt

Tributes to John Gideon, RIP National Election Integrity Hero

I was shocked and saddened to hear about the passing of John Gideon, co director of Voters Unite. John tirelessly sent out the Daily Voting News, along with commentary, 365 days a year beginning with late 2003. John worked non stop, he encouraged each of us in every state to fight, and said that just one person could make a difference. He would know – his efforts made all of the difference. We in North Carolina and other states who care about election transparency owe John a huge debt. We at NCCVV will honor John’s memory by continuing the work we started together long ago. There’s no words to express my gratitude to John for all he did or sadness for how much he will be missed, every day.

Posted here are excerpts from tributes to John Gideon by advocates from around the country. Click on names for full tributes : Ellen Theisen at Voters Unite, Brad Friedman of Brad Blog, Kim Alexander of CalVoter.org, information scientist Joseph Lorenzo Hall, Congressman Rush Holt, Warren Stewart of Verified Voting.org, Bob Fertik at Democrats.com, “Armed Liberal”, Mark Crispin Miller, and Howard Stanislevic of the E-Voter Education Project, and Luther Weeks of CTVotersCount.org , Bo Lipari of NYVV, John Washburn, Rick Hasen of ElectionLawBlog, BlackboxVoting.org, Pokey Anderson – no link posted in full here, Rosemary Rodriguez EAC Chair – no link posted in full here, California Secretary of State Debra Bowen., Brad Friedman and Desi Doyen’s “Green News Report” (audio) tribute to John Gideon, Velvet Revolution, Joan Brunwasser of OpEdNews,Susan Pynchon of Florida Fair Elections Coalition – no link posted in full here, Lani Massey Brown from Ballots of Straw.com, Jerry Adams Oregon Voter Rights Coalition , Kathy Jackson of Voting Matters Blog , Lowell Finley Deputy SoS of California – no link posted in full here, The Verified Voting Foundation, Voter Action.org, Electionline.org – no link posted in full here, Epluribus Media , Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner, Mark Halvorson Citizens for Election Integrity Minnesota – no link posted in full here, Adele Eisner of Citizen’s overseeing Cuyahoga’s Board of Elections – no link posted in full here, Jacob Soboroff at Why Tuesday , Voice of the Voters – no link posted in full here, Center for Election Excellence, Candice Hoke Cleveland, Heleni Thayre Citizens for Election Integrity, MA – no link, posted in full, Jody Holder – no link, posted in full,
Ellen Theisen and Brad Friedman on John Gideon’s Passing at Talk Nation Radio , a tribute by John’s son, Rick Gideon at Remembering John Gideon, Kindra Muntz of Sarasota Alliance for Fair Elections (SAFE) & Co-Founder, Florida Voters Coalition -no link posted in full here ….

If you have a tribute to John that you wish to have posted, please email to joyce at ncvoter.net (If possible, include a permalink to your tribute).

April 29, 2009. Celebrating the Life of John Gideon by Ellen Theisen
John Gideon, my co-director at VotersUnite since May of 2004, passed away last night, April 27, 2009. He is survived by his son, Rick, and his grandson.

This is a picture of John.

He fished for salmon in the Alaskan Pacific and shared his catch freely and generously with his friends. He fished for information in depth and shared what he found freely and generously with anyone who wanted or needed it.

Though one was his play and the other was his work, the two were merely different expressions of who he was as a man.

Outspoken and honorable, diligent and passionately committed to democracy, day after day after day after Daily Voting News, John Gideon was instrumental in shaping the direction of the election integrity movement.

It was an honor to know him and a privilege to have him as my friend and co-director.
Please read the beautiful eulogy written by John’s friend, Brad Friedman. If you didn’t know John, Brad’s post will help you understand the depth of John’s impact. If you did know John, you’ll rejoice in reading what you already know.
Here are some other pictures of John.

4/27/2009 In Memoriam: John Gideon, 1947 – 2009 Brad Friedman (BradBlog)
*note, visit the blog to see many comments honoring John. This euglogy is said to be the most complete and extensive so far. Because of space issues we are only posting an excerpt.**

Father, grandfather, husband, veteran, patriot, co-director of VotersUnite.org, democracy advocate, blogger, friend…

“I will choose to celebrate his life.”- Ellen Theisen, John Gideon’s co-director at VotersUnite.org on his passing
It was a very lonely time for advocates of democracy in the U.S. when John Gideon posted his first guest blog here in the dark days of October 2005, and when we began to carry his vital “Daily Voting News” on Election Day, one month later, in November of that same year
…John’s always-understated “Daily Voting News” — which he filed, often seven days a week, for well over five years — provided simple links to news of election reform, failure and success from around the nation, as culled from papers, blogs, press releases and official and academic reports around the country, and even the world. In so doing, he connected the seemingly disparate dots of local stories, and apparently anecdotal woes, into a cohesive tale of a nation struggling to regain footing on the pedestal on which it had once, and still hoped to stand….

April 28 The passing of an election integrity hero CalVoter Blog. Kim Alexander
This morning I learned that John Gideon passed away last night. The news has saddened many people, including me, who knew John and greatly value his contribution to election reform. He was a tireless champion of truth and relentless in his efforts to hold election officials accountable. Nearly every day for several years he published a free newsletter, “Daily Voting News”, which I and hundreds of other folks received, providing a compilation of important stories and developments in voting technology and elections…

Apr 28 The Passing of John Gideon Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Co-founder of VotersUnite! and good friend, John Gideon, died last night in Seattle after suddenly coming down with (what appears to have been) bacterial meningitis.
I haven’t seen an obituary yet, but when one is written, it will show that he spent his life in service to this country, with the last few years as a central pivot point in the election integrity movement. …

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEApril 28, 2009 Congressman Rush Holt
Contact: Zach Goldberg202-225-5801 (office)
HOLT STATEMENT ON THE DEATH OF VOTING INTEGRITY LEADER JOHN GIDEON
Washington, D.C. – U.S. Representative Rush Holt (NJ-12) today issued the following statement on the sudden passing of John Gideon, a long-standing leader in the electronic voting integrity movement.“I share the deep sense of sadness of everyone in the voting integrity community at the untimely loss of this giant of a man whom we all relied on for the most up-to-date information on issues related to electronic voting security through his Daily Voting News and the endless research and reports on the VotersUnite.org website. My thoughts and prayers are with his family and friends. He will be missed greatly.”

April 28, 2009. In Memoriam John Gideon (1947-2009) By Warren Stewart, Legislative Policy Director, Verified Voting posted at Vote Trust USA
The election reform community was shocked and saddened today by the news of John Gideon’s sudden and untimely passing. John was a mountain of a man and those of us who had the privilege of knowing him are stronger as a result. John’s dedication to the cause of honest, fair, and transparent elections was unparalleled. When I first met John early in 2005, he had already been collecting his “Daily Voting News” for a couple years. This daily news clipping service that gathered voting related news stories from across the country was a labor of love and dedication that served as an essential tool in the struggle for election reform….

April 28, 2009 John Gideon, RIP Bob Fertik
Voting rights leader John Gideon died Monday from a sudden onslaught of bacterial meningitis. Brad Friedman writes a fitting memorial:
He was 62, and a Vietnam veteran who never stopped fighting for his fellow veterans and in service of our country. He is survived by his son Rick and young grandson Collin, and a life-long legacy of fighting in defense of his nation, and for all that it stands for. He has left that legacy behind as a gift — and challenge — for us all. …

April 28, 2009 John Gideon, Voting Integrity Advocate: 1947 – 2009
By Armed Liberal
One of the early sources I looked to as I started educating myself on issues around voting was http://www.votersunite.org/; it was a site that provided a wealth of information that helped me form my opinion that our voting processes were deeply flawed. One of the driving forces behind that site was John Gideon, who died yesterday of meningitis.
…People like John – amateurs who transform their passion into expertise and action – are the reason we should remain optimistic about the state of our Republic….

April 28, 2009 A tribute to John Gideon Posted by mcm
Mission: To encourage citizen ownership of transparent, participatory democracyPosted Tue, 04/28/2009 – 16:55 by luaptifer
John Gideon, 1947 – 2009
It’s a sad moment for advocates of participatory democracy and for all who believe that their vote should count, if it doesn’t already.
Vietnam vet John Gideon died last night after 62 years. I hope that he rests peacefully and satisfied with the work he’s done….

April 28, 2009 Remembering John Gideon (1947-2009) Howard Stanislevic at 4:15 PM
John Gideon, a Co-Director of VotersUnite and Editor and Publisher of Daily Voting News passed away in a Seattle hospital last night after a short bout with bacterial meningitis.

John’s absence is so keenly felt that it already feels like an eternity has passed since getting this awful news. The election integrity community is devastated by this loss and many have been posting their thoughts in various places on the Internet. There is no central repository for them at this time (because there is no Daily Voting News) but here are a few of my thoughts about the man I knew and respected:

John gave voices to the voiceless. His featured articles on Daily Voting News called attention to election integrity issues that would otherwise have been under-reported.Who will report them now?

John was a man of courage. Never have I seen him take a position for the sake of political correctness or to appease special interests. He would have made a great New Yorker!….
…I hope John is not irreplaceable. But I have my doubts about that.He was a rare breed….

April 28, 2009 John Gideon, 1947-2009 By Luther Weeks Connecticut
Voting integrity has lost a great friend, John Gideon. John had a huge impact and leaves us all with a large gap to fill.
John was the co-founder of VotersUnite.org and the producer of the Daily Voting News. John scanned the news daily to provide us all with news from all corners of the Nation and Globe. We found many of the stories relevant to Connecticut at the Daily Voting News. They frequently became the basis of some of our posts. We benefited from his insight and correspondence. John also kindly ran many of our posts. I met John twice and we corresponded frequently. I last saw him three weeks ago when he served as a local host of a conference in Seattle, as always, warm, friendly, and full of life, a friend to everyone….

April 28, 2009 For John Bo Lipari
This morning I woke to the impossible news that my friend John Gideon was gone. Somehow, a big, vibrant man I had seen just a few weeks ago, would no longer be there; a fisherman who went out each and every day to bring in a daily catch of information that fed the many who depended on him would not be returning with the evening tide.

I first met John about 6 years ago when the nascent Election Integrity movement was just a couple of handfuls of people around the country beginning to connect via email. I’ve been trying hard to remember what we first talked about, and exactly how we hooked up, but try as I might the details are lost in time. Over the years as the network grew, we emailed, talked, but met in person only four times. In this virtual community of ours, this is the way of things – lots of communication, very little face time….

…John was one of those rarest of persons who believe that if we are going to get democracy right, we’ve got to get elections right, and if we’re going to get elections right, someone is going to have to roll up their sleeves and pitch in every single day and do the grunt work. John got up every single day and did the grunt work….

April 29, 2009 In Memorium – John Gideon John Washburn
I was stuck with the news that one of my friends, John Gideon, had died today. Well, yesterday, since it has taken me until after midnight to compose my thoughts on the passing of this great man.

…I have benefited greatly from his sage advice, his affectation for technical incompetence, his stiff-necked inspiration, but mostly from his good humor.

More than once he reminded me that Liberty in general and election integrity in particular is a day to day swim against a sometimes stiff current. His humor and optimism combined with his diligence and persistence is/was an inspiration to me an others.

My world, our world, is smaller and poorer place for his absence. I will remember and cherish our friendship until the day I am called home. Good bye, My Friend. Truly, may you now rest in peace where the yoke is easy and the burdens are light….

Good bye, My Friend. Truly, may you now rest in peace where the yoke is easy and the burdens are light.

April 28, 2009 Very Sad News: John Gideon has Died Rick Hasen ElectionLawBlog
Voters’ rights advocate John Gideon has died after a sudden illness. The details are here. Our thoughts go out to his family and friends at this very sad time.

April 28, 2009. John Gideon: 1947-2009 – Loss of a giant voice in election integrity
SOURCE: BlackBoxVoting.ORG
…Gideon was consistently intellectually honest, demonstrating the ability to consider new ideas and rethink old ways, whether or not it was popular. Once he latched onto key concepts for election transparency, he held onto them with the stubbornness and backbone required of great patriots.

Sometimes you can’t replace important voices in a civil rights movement. I don’t think we’ll ever be able to match John’s unique voice. I do have confidence, however, that his vast and effective communications reach developed many new voices, and that together the individuals John Gideon inspired will at least help to fill the hole we’re left with in our hearts, and in our fight to regain self-government….

April 29, 2009 John Gideon RIP. Pokie Anderson, the Monitor Radio Show.
This happened so fast — hospitalized on Sunday, gone by Monday evening — I have emotional whiplash. I cannot really fathom a world, or an election integrity world, without steady John.

I introduced him as “Mr. Encyclopedia” when I had him on my radio show — a person who read a dozen, two dozen, three dozen — who can count? — articles on elections EVERY DAY for years. And could recall the important ones, and who knew how to connect the dots across states.

John befriended or annoyed election officials, repeatedly, persistently, with those damn things called facts, and even got some to pay attention.

John epitomizes the unsung hero. If we ever get our country back, truly back, it will be because of thousands of people like John, each picking something to do and doing it well, unphased by obstacles.

His loss leaves a gaping hole in our movement, and our hearts.
Pokey Anderson co-host, The Monitor radio show

April 29, 2009 John Gideon, EAC Commissioner Rosemary Rodriguez

I am so sad to learn that John Gideon has left us. John was the voice
of the voter. He succeeded in educating us about the need to keep
integrity and transparency at the forefront of elections–at both the
policy and operational levels.

I know, too, that he was passionate about military and Veteran voters,
and was offended, as we all should be, about the difficulty they have in
accessing their right to vote.

There is a big gaping hole in the election community today and I’m not
just referring to John’s size, but to the effect of his work. He will
be missed.

Rosemary Rodriguez

#

April 29th, 2009 CA Sec. of State Debra Bowen on the Passing of John Gideon
posted at Brad Friedman’s blog.

‘His strong voice will be echoed in the continued work of thousands of others’

We here at the Secretary of State’s office send our deep sympathies for the sudden loss of John.

In case you are collecting special thoughts or developing a public message board, Secretary Bowen wanted to send along this contribution:

John Gideon was a tireless advocate who contributed greatly to the election integrity movement. President John Kennedy noted that “true democracy… will not condemn those whose devotion to principle leads them to unpopular courses, but will reward courage, respect honor, and ultimately recognize right.” John Gideon was courageously devoted to his democracy, and his strong voice will be echoed in the continued work of thousands of others. My deepest condolences go out to John’s family and his entire circle of friends.

Debra Bowen California Secretary of State.

#
For John… (audio) ‘Green News Report’ 4/28/09
Brad Friedman and Desi Doyen’s “Green News Report” (audio) tribute to John Gideon
PLUS: A tribute to John Gideon…
(John Gideon was an environmentalist also)

4/28/09: Remembering Our Colleague And Friend John Gideon Velvet Revolution
…We first met John five years ago in Washington DC when he attended an election reform conference. He was an impressive and committed activist who wanted to “get it right.”
…John has been involved with most of our key election integrity campaigns, many of them originating with his ideas. He has pulled weight where it counted, largely in the background, and his wisdom and advice have been invaluable. John will be sorely missed and his passing shrinks the pool of leaders in this election integrity field. It will be impossible to fill his shoes, but we now pledge to continue his work and his vision.

April 28, 2009 In Memoriam: John Gideon, 1947 – 2009 Submitted by Joan Brunwasser OpEdNews

I am awed by the challenge, and mission, that John has left behind for me, and for all of us.Until then,I hope you’ll join me in remembering by carrying his torch, his challenge and his mission wherever, and however, you can…as if the future of this nation depended on it.Because I truly believe that it does. Thank you for everything, John. You will be missed, my friend, more than you will ever know…

#

Tribute to John Gideon, 1947-2009 Susan Pynchon, Florida Fair Elections Coalition

John Gideon was a giant of a man, both physically and in the strength of his spirit and dedication to election integrity and voting rights. It’s amazing how one man touched so many lives for the good.

As did many others, I considered John to be my friend and my mentor. He always had time to listen and to talk; he always seemed to have the bit of knowledge I was missing on a particular subject; and he was always supportive. The first grant that our fledgling organization ever received came from John and Ellen Theisen through VotersUnite, which scarcely had funding itself. When our final report on the 2006 Sarasota debacle was shunned by some of the “experts,” John was a staunch supporter. When my candidacy for supervisor of elections was ignored or criticized by many in the election integrity world, John sent a personal check for $500 to my campaign — he understood that, for me, this was an extension of my activism and the thing I had to do to try to correct the wrongs I had witnessed locally. When I misunderstood or misstated anything, John never attacked but would gently state the facts, as he also did for others. Often, when I had a question, I would pick up the phone to call John for the answer I knew would be right. And every day, the Daily Voting News arrived like a supportive friend, containing not only a wealth of election-related articles but also John’s lively and informed comments, as irreplaceable as John himself.

I depended on John not only for his factual knowledge but for his opinions on so many subjects. I admired his humility, his tenacity and his courage — the way he never sought the limelight but was never afraid to speak truth to power — and keep on speaking it. I respected him for his encyclopedic mind and his willingness to share his knowledge without ever sounding superior. I felt humbled by his reliability and his willingness, as others have said, to do the “grunt” work without complaint.

I am very very sad at losing this great man. I’m sad for his family. I’m sad for Ellen Theisen. I’m sad for the entire election integrity movement, which has lost a wise and powerful voice. And I’m sad for myself. I miss knowing you are there, John. I will never forget you. Rest in peace.

Susan Pynchon
Florida Fair Elections Coalition

#

In Memory of John Gideon, 1947 – 2009 Lani Brown A Margin of Error: Ballots of Straw

John Gideon, co-director of Voters Unite! and author of the Daily Voting News passed away last night in Seattle leaving a void in the voting integrity world that may never be filled. Indeed, the world has lost a true hero, a man of unparalleled integrity. On a more personal level, one only has to shuffle through a few of my articles to know the importance to me of information provided by John and his co-director Ellen Theisen on Voters Unite!

Last year during a particularly rough patch, John said if it got any worse he just might run away to Belize. I’d like to remember him there. Sailing off toward the setting sun with fair-weather breezes gently guiding him along his way.

Please see Brad Friedman’s tribute In Memoriam: John Gideon, 1947 – 2009: Father, grandfather, husband, veteran, patriot, co-director of VotersUnite.org, democracy advocate, blogger, friend…Lani Massey Brown A Margin of Error: Ballots of Straw

# # #

Tribute to John Gideon. Jerry Adams, Oregon Voter Rights Coalition.

One of John’s legacies has been to co-lead in providing opportunities for civil dialogue among diverse opinion leaders within the field of election integrity.

The opportunities have been a valuable contribution to the EI field. John’s dedication through his news work has provided an additional legacy.
I am one of those who have benefited in this arena and would like to acknowledge my gratitude. When a small band of us decided to put on a national conference on EI in Portland a few years back, John gave generously of his time to help make it a success.

John is one of the giants in our field; he will be sorely missed.
Jerry Adams Oregon Voter Rights Coalition

# # #
04.29.09 In Memoriam John Gideon 1947-2009 Voting Matters Blog

In a gentle way you can shake the world.
– Mahatma Gandhi

The election integrity community was shocked and saddened to learn of the untimely passing of John Gideon, a gentle yet passionately committed giant who devoted himself to the mission which is posted at the top of the VotersUnite.org website: “to encourage citizen ownership of transparent, participatory democracy.”

Mahatma Gandhi believed that we must be the change we want to see in the world. This was well demonstrated when he helped India gain its independence. Gandhi was a revolutionary man, but he accomplished India’s emergence as a nation without starting a revolution. In fact, he advocated no violence. One of the most powerful countries in the world yielded to the commitment of one man and the dream of millions.

In his own way John Gideon took up the Gandhi’s prescription for changing the world without starting a revolution. He decided to be the change he wanted to see. John’s cause was election integrity and he followed Theodore Roosevelt’s prescription for how to go about it: “Do what you can, with what you have, where you are….Without being a revolutionary, John helped cause a sea change in U.S. elections…..

# # #

Tribute to John Gideon by Lowell Finley. California Deputy Secretary of State.

John Gideon lent quiet assistance many times during the years I worked on election integrity issues as a private citizen. I often called upon his extensive knowledge for answers to questions about specific voting systems and problems that arose in their use across the country. He usually had the answer immediately. If not, he would call back soon with the needed information. John also contacted Voter Action when he came across information he thought might be of particular value. These behind-the-scenes contributions played a very important role in Voter Action’s litigation efforts. John did the same for many individuals and organizations, all while putting together the indispensable Daily Voting News.

John continued to be a positive influence when I became a state elections official. I learned, sometimes painfully, what it was like to be on the receiving end of John’s demands for accountability and transparency in the administration of elections.

John Gideon helped the election integrity movement keep rolling forward, like a hub from which many spokes radiated. He was constant, he was strong, he was fair to all and he had the courage of his convictions. I hope it is of some comfort to John’s family in their time of loss to know how much he meant to so many people, and how dearly we will miss him.

Lowell Finley
Sacramento, California

# # #

In Memoriam: John Gideon by the Verified Voting Foundation

…His was a labor of love and dedication that served as an essential tool in the struggle for election reform. Retired from the Navy, John was dogged in his refusal of any compensation for his work. Throughout our work together, John was steadfast in his support of local grassroots efforts and a consistent champion of integrity and transparency. A disabled Vietnam veteran, John was also deeply concerned about issues affecting his brothers and sisters in the armed services and brought the same passion and dedication to those issues that he did to preserving the integrity of elections.

Thomas Jefferson wrote “the price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” No one better embodied these words than John Gideon.

# # #
Our Friend John Gideon VoterAction.org
We at Voter Action are deeply saddened by the news of John Gideon’s sudden passing last night, April 27th, 2009. John, co-founder of VotersUnite.org, was a tireless advocate and model of courage in the fight for election integrity in the United States. He will be incredibly missed. Brad Friedman of BradBlog.com, where John was a frequent contributor, has posted a moving tribute to our friend and colleague which can be found, here.

John’s spirit and work will live on in all of us in the democracy movement.

Voter Action recommends that contributions to honor John’s work be made to VotersUnite.org via this link:http://www.votersunite.org/donate.asp

# # #

April 30, 2009 I. In Focus This Week
Director’s Note: John Gideon 1947-2009 By
Doug Chapin Electionline

The election community lost one of its most dedicated and persistent voices with the sudden death of John Gideon earlier this week at age 62. John’s “Daily Voting News” e-mail newsletter – which hit my PDA with impressive regularity right about 7pm Eastern every weekday and Sunday – was a thorough look at coverage of voting technology issues across the nation.

Every day’s edition was full of news coverage laced with a heavy dose of John’s fierce commentary and eager demands for vigilance and/or change in the technology that Americans use to cast ballots. At electionline.org and Pew alike, we have always considered DVN a valuable resource for our own coverage of election issues across the country.

Indeed, I often referred journalists to John for comment both because I knew he had an opinion and because he would have no hesitation in sharing it on the record in blunt, forceful, quotable language – as he did with me regularly when he felt I wasn’t paying sufficient attention.

The word amateur gets a bad rap in our current language; in particular, current usage suggests that not being paid (i.e not being a professional) makes one unprofessional and thus implies lower quality or reliability of the work. The truth is that the word amateur is derived from the French and Latin words for “love”, suggesting that an amateur is someone who engages in a pursuit simply because they love and believe in it.

John Gideon’s devotion to the issue of voting technology – and his dedication to assembling and delivering DVN almost every day without fail – made him an amateur in the very best sense of the word. His skilled contributions to the field of election reform are significant and will be sorely missed – by me and many others, as this tribute page to John attests. On behalf of all of us here, I extend my sympathies to his family and friends at this sad and sudden loss.

# # #
Mission: To encourage citizen ownership of transparent, participatory democracy
Posted Tue, 04/28/2009 – 08:55 by luaptifer Epluribus Media
John Gideon, 1947 – 2009

…It’s a sad moment for advocates of participatory democracy and for all who believe that their vote should count, if it doesn’t already.
…That’s because, in the years of publishing “Daily Voting News,” I recognized the voice of a man who dedicated his best efforts to doing what he had to do, only because it was the necessary and right thing to do….

…I didn’t know him personally, but I knew John Gideon. He was the kind of person that I always hope to meet face to face, as a tireless soul who did what he felt must be done, regardless of whether or not we ever said to him, “Great job!”

Great job, John.

His devotion will be missed. May he rest in peace.

# # #

5/1/2009 OH Sec. of State Jennifer Brunner on John Gideon posted at BradBlog
‘Our nation has lost a true hero of democracy…I salute his courage for asking the tough questions’
PLUS: Activist turned CA Dep. SoS Lowell Finley offers his unique perspective as well…
Condolences, and a very moving statement, were sent to me this morning on the loss of John Gideon, from OH Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner via her Director of Communications, Patrick Gallaway:

…Message from Ohio Secretary of State Jenifer Brunner on the passing of John Gideon:
“Our nation has lost a true hero of democracy with the passing of John Gideon. John will be remembered and honored for his skills to keep so many people engaged in the elections process. His ability to gather, relay and assess elections information from across the country was simply amazing and through his organization of Voters Unite kept so many informed on the hot-button issues that at times truly drive our work to provide elections for all Americans that are free, fair, open and honest….

John will also be remembered for his dedication to veteran voters and I honor him for his service to our country in one of the most contentious of wars – Vietnam. Thank you John for your patriotism, support of an elections system that treated all as equals and your efforts to help voters from across the country. I do hope your valued work will live on, you will be missed.”

# # #
Remembering John Gideon, a hero for democracy:It was great to see John recently at a conference in Seattle. John was so proud and happy to welcome everyone to Washington!I am so appreciative of all the great work that John and Ellen have produced with Voters Unite. We’ve used their materials many times. I have distributed at least 100 copies of Myth Busters. As others, I am especially grateful for John putting out the Daily Voting News – 7 days a week!

Several times I sent have him news reports, especially during the Minnesota recount, but it was rare that he didn’t already have what I sent him. I am also grateful that he provided a link to our MN Recount blog on the VotersUnite homepage. I was intrigued when I learned from John how Oklahoma kicked out the voting machine vendors many years ago. A great example for other states and a great example of the Voters Unite motto – “To encourage citizen ownership of transparent, participatory democracy.”

Thanks John for your passion, your tenacity and your outspoken commitment to improving our election system. You will be deeply missed.

Mark Halvorson
Citizens for Election Integrity Minnesota

# # #

In Memoriam: John Gideon, 1947 – 2009. Adele Eisner of “Citizen’s overseeing Cuyahoga’s Board of Elections”
Never for self, always for all; never to hoard, always to share and connect;always in integrity when standing firmly in and for the light of the integrityof who we are capable of being, and must become.
A life truly well lived.
I will be among the many who miss him… Adele

# # #

John Gideon, Election Reformer Was 62. Why Tuesday. Jacob Soboroff
…The last time I received my ‘Daily Voting News’ from John Gideon was April 23rd. John, a friend of Why Tuesday? who Barnett and I met at the Claim Democracy election reform conference in Washington D.C., passed away this week after a sudden illness.

…His updates about the world of elections and election reform frequently made it onto this blog, and his dedication to making sure the United States voting system was the best it could be rubbed off on all of us here.

# # #

In Memoriam: John Gideon, 1947-2009 Voice of the Voters and Coalition for Voting Integrity
The country has lost a true hero and we have lost a true friend
and irreplaceable contributor to the Voice of the Voters.
Our hearts go out to Ellen Theisen, his co-director at VotersUnite.org;
John’s son and grandson; and
all who cherished this great man.

# # #
Remembering John Gideon’s Generosity to Ohio and the Nation –Center for Election Excellence, Candice Hoke, Cleveland

The loss of John Gideon is incalculable. John Gideon was a stalwart friend of Ohio and all who seek transparency, accountability, fair access, and accuracy in elections.
John argued that our American birthright was slipping away by our ceding control over elections to private companies, permitting them to conduct elections and produce election results not subject to independent checks and public accountability.

John was also a friend to all whose voting rights were potentially injured by unreliable voting equipment. After Cuyahoga County, Ohio sustained a notorious election debacle when transitioning to e-voting, the Cuyahoga Election Review Panel (CERP) was charged to investigate the causes of all election problems and to recommend remedies. VotersUnite.org materials helped us learn about similar problems elsewhere. This web-based relationship matured into an ongoing professional relationship when the Public Monitor Project (a part of the Center for Election Integrity at Cleveland State University) began its work in August 2006.

…John assisted election officials in avoiding overpriced voting equipment that often failed in recording and counting votes accurately. He did not blame the officials but the federal government’s certification testing that allowed defective voting and voter registration equipment to be marketed and purchased with our tax dollars. John was essentially a “disgruntled citizen” who tirelessly sought to improve his nation’s government….

…Through VotersUnite.Org and Daily Voting News, John facilitated the work of citizens, advocacy organizations, election officials, academics, and policymakers who sought to achieve fair, honest elections.

# # #
John Gideon: An example to everyone Heleni Thayre Citizens for Election Integrity, MA

I never met or even spoke to John Gideon and know him only through my friends in the Election Integrity movement and from the Daily Voting News. However I believe he provides a most important lesson to all Americans.

Over and over I hear people say when I tell them about my concerns and our election systems: “There is nothing I can do about it.”

What a distressing point of view. Sometimes I can see them turn away and and can almost see them close their ears.

And it is so untrue. John Gideon is the proof of that in spades. Taking a simple concept, following it with dogged commitment and intelligently expanding its potential, John’s work has greatly enhanced the efficacy of the work of the entire Election Integrity movement.
The information he provided daily was raw data for the work of hundreds, maybe thousands, of people.

The personal connections he established with election officials and legislators created a conduit of information to them that was miraculous in its reach. Over time they trusted him and this created a respect for our work and our message.
But above all John exemplified what one dedicated and caring person can do to change this world.
Never, never let it be said that one person cannot make a difference for the better. That simply is not true. We know it. I hope is that more and more people will come to know this too.

Heleni Thayre
Citizens for Election Integrity, MA

# # #

John Gideon, a Hero. by Joseph Holder

For the last several years John Gideon dedicated his life, efforts, and values to the issue of restoring the public’s confidence in our electoral process. He did so with dedication, integrity, respect, self-sacrifice, and with a moral compass that reflects a man that truly encompasses the acts and values required of a hero.

As humans we have the capacity of appreciation, a higher cognitive ability to evaluate and compare. But appreciation is more than just a rational evaluation; it also involves our emotional recognition of values personified. It is difficult to put into words, and words often fail to adequately express our thoughts and feelings towards others. My opportunity to interact with John over the last several years has left me with a great appreciation of him as a person.
It has been pointed out many times that we cannot feel great joy unless we have felt great sadness. To walk among the emerging new life of spring is much more pleasant because of the cold and emptiness of the winter past. Our capacity to appreciate particular humans is because of those times we have been sorely disappointed with others. It is that stark contrast that so magnifies our appreciation when we have the opportunity to be involved with someone like John.

Unfortunately the term hero has been trivialized from being used with so little discrimination. I use that term very sparingly, because I want it to adequately express my recognition and appreciation for when someone is a true hero. To me a hero is someone who is recognized for courage, self-sacrifice, and going beyond the normal expectations and responsibilities of life. To do so requires that person to have ethics, values, and a sense of responsibility towards others that supersedes their own interests.

Many of us have been in this endeavor long enough that we are starting to see the passing of other heroes that have sacrificed much in the name of election reform. It behooves us to express our appreciation and recognition of others’ efforts in this reform movement, especially while they are still alive. The dedication and sacrifice required for this largely voluntary effort is difficult to sustain, and little words of encouragement and appreciation can mean a lot. I know that John appreciated such efforts, and was quick himself to do likewise.

This outpouring of appreciation from those he was in contact with, from all over the country, including fellow activist and election officials, is testament to how he treated others. I hope his family is given some comfort by this nationwide recognition of his efforts and integrity. The world is a better place because he lived. John Gideon was a true hero, and will be sorely missed.
With respect, appreciation, and thanks,

Jody Holder

# # #

Ellen Theisen and Brad Friedman on John Gideon’s Passing
Talk Nation Radio for May 6, 2009by Dori Smith30 minutes, audio http://talknationradio.com/?p=338

# # #
Remembering John Gideon By Rick Gideon, son.

Rick has posted a page where you can make comments and sign up to be notified of the date/time of the memorial to John. He plans to have a simultaneous physical/virtual memorial sometime in June…

# # #

Very Sad News — RIP John Gideon 1947-2009. Kindra Muntz -Sarasota Alliance for Fair Elections (SAFE) & Co-Founder, Florida Voters Coalition

What a shock and a sadness to learn of the death of John Gideon.
He has been a friend to us all, to every person who fights for election integrity in this country, and to millions of unnamed voters who have benefited from his work and his dedication.

The greatest tribute we could offer is to continue his work and ours and help his mission become a reality:

“to encourage citizen ownership of transparent, participatory democracy”.

Brad, thank you for your eloquent tribute to John, your friendship with him, and for your never-ending dedication to the cause of democracy in this country. I grieve with you and Ellen and all who loved him.

Kindra

And here is Kindra’s extended Memorial Day Tribute to John:

In Memoriam, John Gideon (1947-2009)

On Memorial Day I am thinking again of John Gideon, and his service to his country both in Viet Nam and in his work for voting integrity. I am grateful that the Daily Voting News is being continued by Ellen Theisen, John Washburn and Dave Klein, and that long-term plans for this important work are being formulated.

I met John at Lobby Days events in Washington, D.C. sponsored by VerifiedVoting.org and VoteTrustUSA. John was a strong and focused man, resolved to share the information the public needs to understand what is happening to elections in America.

As co-founder of Votersunite.org and publisher of the Daily Voting News, John’s contributions were significant. John knew the vital service he could provide, and was dedicated to his work. Day after day he combed news sources around the country and the world to capture the voting news that shapes our nation. Developments were sometimes encouraging, sometimes not, but the perspective his readers gained was invaluable.

Democracy takes work. It will not survive on its own. It is quite clear that those in power want to stay in power, sometimes by whatever means possible. If they win by suppressing or manipulating the vote, they care less about voters and more about special interests who fund their campaigns. It is up to citizens to fight for our voting rights, for clean elections and transparency in the process, and for accurate counting of votes. For democracy to succeed, we must elect our leaders, not have the leaders choose us.

Thomas Jefferson said “the price of freedom is eternal vigilance”. That is apparent every day.

Thank you, John, for all you did to lead us toward “citizen ownership of transparent, participatory democracy.” You were a teacher, an inspiration, and a true public servant. I miss you greatly, and wish you peace.

Kindra Muntz
Sarasota Alliance for Fair Elections
Co-Founder, Florida Voters Coalition
http://www.safevote.org/
http://www.safevote.org/

#

Donations to make it possible for VotersUnite to continue John’s work can be made here.

Joyce McCloy
Director, NC Coalition for Verified Voting
http://www.ncvoter.net/